A Student Response to The Beetle

Gothic Penetrations of the Body in Richard Marsh’s The Beetle

Richard Marsh’s The Beetle reimagines Gothic penetrability to be something unsettling and uncomfortably horrific. Robert Holt comes in contact with a series of strange circumstances after finding a mysterious and presumably forgotten house. In this desolate house, Robert undergoes a degrading transformation at the hands of an unnatural force. Marsh describes this strange force as a creature mentally capable of understanding the world (language, knowledge), but physically has the appearance of something inhuman. The exact description of this being is purposely difficult to envision since it consists of an unorthodox combination of traits (such as having no chin and multiple eyes). Robert attempts to internally verbalize the atrocity of this being, stating it to be a “monstrous conception of some dreadful vision” thought up by his imagination (51).

The act of bodily penetration by a Gothic force reveals how delicate human minds and bodies are against an unknown dominator, or in this case, a grotesque being. Robert unexpectedly becomes under the control of this creature that has the “powers of penetration” through eye contact (55). As Robert physically (not mentally) remains at the mercy of his superhuman oppressor, he changes into something inhuman as well. Specifically, the creature compels him to remove every form of clothing from his body until he is in a naked a vulnerable state. From a post-colonial perspective, this transformation into something primal (not having the capability of clothing oneself) reveals how dominating the unnatural is over inferior humans.

An extremely intimate penetration occurs through the exchange of bodily fluids between the creature and Robert. While still being in a helpless state of paralysis, Robert experiences a transfer of “something evil…in the guise of a kiss” (57). Marsh does not clarify whether the creature was putting a part of himself into Robert’s body or if it was a transfer of possession (moving out of the old man and into a younger vessel). The lack of clarification in this scene establishes an uncanny sensation, leaving the reader to deduce what was in the kiss. Perhaps the kiss was meant as a contract or pact between Robert and the creature, or the creature was transferring part of itself into Robert as a way to gain more control. Either way, Marsh leaves it up to our imaginations to find out what the purpose of this kiss was.

Robert continues to forcefully undergo bodily penetration with more devastating effects once the creature gains control over his voice. When Robert first hears the creature’s voice through commands and questions, he answers with “passive obedience” (54). Whether it is due to the effects of hypnotism or some other force at work, Robert’s voice lands in the hands of his oppressor, leaving him to rely on his internal voice for some kind of mental expression (only heard by the reader). The creature’s inability to have complete domination over Robert physically and mentally may suggest consciousness is powerful enough to resist foreign invasion. However, Robert’s voice reforms into something monstrous and unrecognizable when he says “THE BEETLE” in a “low, hissing” sound (76). As simple as this word is, it has the power to call upon forces of evil and render the receiver of this word helpless.

Penetration initially seems to occur once Robert makes direct eye contact with the creature in the shadows or through its “most disagreeable voice” (52). However, there is an implication suggesting Robert was the first to penetrate the creature after sneaking into its space (the house). Based on how the creature is drawn out to be a spider-like being in combination with Robert’s entanglement with the creature’s plan to steal Paul Lessingham’s letters (as well as his entrapment in the house due to hypnosis), the narrative reveals the house to be the physical manifestation of a spider’s web.

Robert’s experience with this inhuman adversary is chilling to the bone because Marsh does not initially explain the reasoning behind this creature’s actions and demeanor. Marsh’s details toward the creature’s appearance are difficult to envision because its strangeness does not fit in the human world. At the same time, Robert slowly transitions into an unrecognizable character after the creature penetrates his body. This transformation suggests Robert is becoming just as grotesque in appearance as the creature. The only thing preventing him from completely crossing the threshold between human and inhuman is his consciousness. Gothic penetrations of the body are unsettling for both the characters and the readers because they truly show how easy it is to control human beings.

Works Cited

Marsh, Richard. The Beetle. 1915. Edited by Julian Wolfreys, Broadview Press, 2004, pp. 41-88.

4 thoughts on “A Student Response to The Beetle

  1. This is a fantastically written blog entry, I too felt this same sense of unease by unorthodox biological features.


  2. It is interesting that Marsh turns something like a kiss, something that should be a sign of closeness and love, and warps it within the narrative. This novel really appealed to me because of the twisting of what would normally be considered wholesome and noble. The morphing of voice or the means to communicate was another excellent example. The Beetle worked in a gothic register that is well suited to this type of exposition of the natural and the unnatural. What is more the language and imagery invoked a real sense of unease throughout. Even weeks later the mood of this novel sits with me.


  3. I really enjoyed reading your blog post! I agree with your stance that the beetle is a rather unsettling novel. The vagueness of what the creature is creates such an unnerving narrative. Being in the dark with a creature that you can feel but you can’t see would be a terrifying ordeal for anyone.


  4. Fascinating, thorough analysis here. The idea of the Beetle reducing Holt’s humanity, and framing it within the larger discourse of colonialism is clever, and something that didn’t occur to me until reading this blog post.

    Holt’s state of being, fuzzy consciousness, and penetrability (as the writer has aptly argued), is such an off-putting, discomforting part of the novel. To me, the other characters in the novel treat Holt as a disposable vehicle — something the Beetle can literally inhabit and control, and a something the other characters use to transport them further in their investigation. Holt’s last words before dying are contributions to the investigation, which totally robs that moment of profundity and humanity — this is especially shocking and dehumanizing considering Holt is the narrator for the first section of the novel.

    I appreciate the colonial aspect of the blog post. It’s another layer to an already fascinating analysis. There might be a classism aspect to Marsh’s treatment of Holt too.

    Thank you, writer, for these new, important insights.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s